data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ecd3/0ecd337cdd058a5237f4e595b7c450596769c33c" alt=""
If you want to do any of those... if you think any of those scenarios strike as appealing (I believe they represent the best available in free agency, short of offering the farm to Vince Wilfork)... you have a serious question to answer in the name you mentioned. What will it take to bring Orton back, and what does this decision allow you to do moving forward?
I'd swing it this way. If I'm Kyle Orton, coming off of this season, would you consider taking a mild hit in the paycheck to stay, to continue the journey, and to put a full effort in becoming the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96d03/96d03e353f79dfbad29e7528ddab3add1ad8840b" alt=""
I'd bring Orton back on a two-year deal with a team option on the third offering good - not great - money, give the proper wheel-barrel bank drop to Elvis, and consider using the remains on at least one of the players mentioned above (my vote is for Scaife).
And yes, it may be an uncapped season... but I'd suggest this isn't likely to motivate a change in operation for Bowlen (most teams will cut spending and Bowlen can be a hero by holding steady... he's a successful sports owner and business man for a reason).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b699/8b699dacced2b3ae88de73c35287b6ad25e121b2" alt=""
Back to Orton, here is the thing about Orton...he is not a bad Quarterback, not at all! For some reason however it did appear that McDaniels limited the offensive playcalling. That blame doesn't fall on Orton. Two things that were apparent to me were 1. An obvious lack of deep pass plays 2. Most WR's caught the ball in a stopped position. Rarely, although it did occur, did you see Orton hitting a WR in stride on the move. Most of his completions were hitches or hook routes where the Wide Out was a "sitting target". It became more and more apparent that McDaniels wanted a game manager and not a game breaker. He limited the throws to limit the turnovers but in turn limited the big plays.
I have spoken to Defensive players, some were Defensive Backs, who played against the Broncos in 2009 and they specifically told me that in team meetings in the week leading up to the game, Defensive coaches told them that Denver is unwilling to go deep so in turn, keep everything in front of you and read and react to the WR's. If they stop and turn, jump the route. One told me it was actually a relief because his thinking was Brandon Marshall is a monster to cover on deep balls so he was glad that Denver didn't utilize that skill set.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/801ee/801ee04b65d91a98a50537865f1e81901a024253" alt=""
3 comments:
No problem giving Elvis his due, but with an 8/8 record. With reward should also be losses. Some that did not perform should have something taken away. I don't believe in the give and give system. That being the case do the TD dance after you fumble or throw a pick.
No need to tell me how dumb I am. I have heard it all before. However, I am a professional negotiator and I look at things other than how well a player has been. In the Elvis case, he is currently more valuable on the trading block than he is on the field. The Broncs can get two very good picks for him and use the salary savings to secure Kuper and at least one other free agent. That is a four to one payoff. Elvis will never be worth more than he is now. New England seems to be the only team that understands that some players have more value on the trading block. See last year's draft and the Seymore trade.
You're not dumb Dave, you're right, he's worth a Ton right now. But still rather keep him.
Post a Comment